Improving IDP with Human-in-the-Loop

In recent years, there has been a growing interest in the field of Intelligent Document Processing (IDP), which refers to the use of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) technologies to automate the processing of unstructured data in documents. While IDP has shown great promise in improving the speed and accuracy of document processing, it is not without its limitations. One challenge that many businesses face when implementing IDP solutions is the need to balance automation with human oversight to ensure accuracy and quality.

To address this challenge, many businesses are turning to a Human-in-the-Loop (HITL) approach, which involves the integration of human intelligence into the automated document processing workflow.

In this article, we will explore how HITL approaches can be used in IDP to improve accuracy and efficiency, including techniques like active learning, supervised learning, and hybrid approaches.

What is the Human-in-the-Loop Approach?

The HITL approach involves the integration of human intelligence into the automated processing workflow. This can be achieved in various ways, such as using human review to validate automated results or having humans perform specific tasks that the AI system is not yet capable of performing accurately.

HITL is becoming increasingly popular in IDP because it provides businesses with the best of both worlds: the speed and accuracy of automated processing and the quality and oversight of human intelligence.

IDP Learning models

Active learning is a machine learning technique that involves a human supervisor who actively selects and labels data that the model is uncertain about. This allows the model to improve its accuracy and reduce errors by learning from the human’s feedback. In the context of IDP, active learning can be used to identify and correct errors in the automated processing of documents, while also improving the accuracy of the IDP system over time. For example, if the system is unsure about the classification of a particular document, it can send it to a human supervisor for review and correction. The corrected data can then be used to improve the accuracy of the IDP system, reducing the need for further human intervention in the future.

Supervised learning is another machine learning technique that involves training a model using labeled data. In the context of IDP, this can involve training a model to recognize specific types of documents, such as invoices or contracts, by using examples of labeled data. Once the model has been trained, it can be used to automatically process similar documents with a high degree of accuracy. However, supervised learning is not perfect, and errors can still occur. By integrating human oversight into the workflow, businesses can catch and correct errors, improving the accuracy and quality of the automated processing.

Hybrid approaches combine the best of both worlds, combining the strengths of automated processing with the oversight of human intelligence. In the context of IDP, this can involve using a combination of machine learning and human review to achieve the best possible outcomes. For example, the system can use automated processing to extract data from a document, which is then reviewed by a human to ensure accuracy. The human can then correct any errors and provide feedback to the system, which can use this feedback to improve its processing capabilities in the future.

Conclusions

Overall, the use of HITL approaches in IDP can help businesses achieve higher levels of accuracy and efficiency while also reducing the need for manual intervention. By leveraging techniques like active learning, supervised learning, and hybrid approaches, businesses can automate the processing of unstructured data in documents while still ensuring accuracy and quality. However, it is important to note that HITL approaches require a certain level of investment in terms of time and resources, as well as a deep understanding of the specific needs and challenges of the business.

When it comes to choosing an IDP tool with a built-in human in the loop, there are a few key factors to consider.

• First, look for a tool that allows for easy integration with your existing workflows and systems. This will ensure a seamless transition to the new IDP solution and avoid any disruptions to your document processing operations.
• Secondly, consider the level of customization and flexibility offered by the tool. Different organizations have different document processing needs and requirements, and a tool that can be tailored to your specific use case will be more effective in improving accuracy and efficiency.
• Finally, look for a tool that offers robust reporting and analytics capabilities. This will allow you to track the performance of the IDP system and identify areas for improvement, as well as provide insights into the effectiveness of the human in the loop component.

In conclusion, choosing an IDP tool with a built-in human in the loop can bring significant benefits to your document processing operations. By leveraging the strengths of both AI and human intelligence, you can achieve greater accuracy, efficiency, and flexibility in processing a wide range of documents. With careful consideration and selection of the right tool, you can transform your document processing workflows and achieve significant cost and time savings.

Book a meeting and learn more about how you can start your all-inclusive IDP journey.